Page 1 of 2

Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:32 am
by Monica
Work has been a bear, leaving me with no brain to do anything at night, but I managed to play a bit this weekend. I jumped right into the alcohol inks day, because those have been a favorite of mine since they first debuted.

There are two tags for each technique because I decided to try each on both the white cardstock yupo and the translucent yupo, to see if I prefer one surface to the other for anything. And because I bought a pack of each anyway. :lol: Tech #1 the translucent yupo is on the left. In the others, it's on the right. So far my favorite is technique #4, but I still have 2 more from this day to do, so we'll see!

Technique #1
Image

Technique #2
Image

Technique #3
Image

Technique #4
Image

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:13 am
by azemigh
Gorgeous, Monica! Love them all, but your flower ROCKS! Can hardly wait for my yupo to arrive. :cool5:

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:34 am
by pamcook
So, so pretty! I love everything about all of them.

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:57 pm
by ScrappinJen
With all this talk of Yupo, I had to go google it. What is the advantage of it? Please inform me. Thanks.

Love the results you are getting from this class.

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:54 pm
by mpizzazz
Very nice, Monica! Thanks for posting so the rest of us can see. Any opinions yet on which Yupo you like?

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:19 pm
by azemigh
ScrappinJen wrote:With all this talk of Yupo, I had to go google it. What is the advantage of it? Please inform me. Thanks.

Love the results you are getting from this class.
According to Tim Yupo is completely non-porous, even glossy cardstock is slightly porous and will absorb the alcohol inks. It's supposed to sit and move on the Yupo like it was plastic or metal. I'm thinking it will act more like it does on a transparency.

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:31 pm
by Monica
Thanks, Rachelle! I'm doing a coffee stamp next. :)

Thanks, Pam. I'm having a blast doing them.

Jen, the advantage to Yupo is that it's a synthetic (plastic) paper. A completely non-porous surface ideal for the alcohol inks.

I'm still working on that, Marianne. There are definite advantages to both. I think it will vary by technique. For #3 I prefer the translucent look, but that could also be the colors I chose for each. For the flower I really like them both.

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 1:04 am
by paddlegal
Wow Monica! Love #4 flowers as well as #2 tags. #3 on the right is really cool too. Heck, they're all terrific. Now I am going to have to get me some Yupo and thanks for the explanation. I was clueless also on what that was.

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:43 am
by mpizzazz
Basically Yupo is plastic. Here is some info about it:
http://yupousa.com/what-is-yupo/
http://www.legionpaper.com/yupo

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:05 am
by paddlegal
[quote="mpizzazz"]Basically Yupo is plastic. Here is some info about it:
http://yupousa.com/what-is-yupo/
http://www.legionpaper.com/yupo[/quotet

Terrific. Thanks Marianne!

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:07 pm
by troublesmom
Monica I love your tags! The blue with Technique 3 is my favorite!

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:44 am
by ScrappinJen
I think my fave is the blue with Technique 2. They're all very cool.

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:23 pm
by Debbie J
Mall the techniques look like fun!

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 2:04 pm
by Monica
Thanks, all! I haven't gotten back to the CC103 tags, and may not until next month. We go on vacation the 22nd through 30th, which means work and trip organization until then! ;)

Re: Monica's CC103 tags

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:12 pm
by Keitha
Gorgeous tags Monica! I bought some Yupo paper but haven't used it yet. Now I'm thinking I might have to sign up for this class after all...